If people do not like me, they can always killfile me. You make no
sense, Steve.
L.B.
Please consider the following messages before reading the lb_faq and
engaging in discussion with "s_o_keefe":
----------------------------------
From:Dean-O-Vision - view profile
come back, Bullingdon. This newsgroup needs you more than ever. At
least
your posts were somewhat on topic.
---------------------------------
From: The Man With No Name - view profile
Had a quick glance at this F.A.Q. and, I must say;
Is that all?? He offers a few unpopular opinions and you label him a
troll?
Going by my own experience, LB seems to be just about the only person
on this newsgroup who actually posts ABOUT KUBRICK. So, regardless of
whether or not I agree with his old views, the simple fact that he's
actually making relevant posts and not just prattling on about his
hatred for Bush (or whoever) makes him a *far* more valued poster than
most other people on this group.
-------------------------------------------
From: Nick C - view profile
I tend to agree on this point. Steve claimed that I "disinformed" him
because I claimed I wasn't a "newbie" and didn't have the e-mail
address to back it up. News flash Steve - I don't assume that weirdos
like you do internet searches on people and try to figure them out.
For some reason, when I think of Steve O Keefe now, images of a fat guy
in a basement surrounded by pizza boxes and empty 2 liters of coke come
to mind. How's that for "disinformation", asshole?
-----------------------------------------------
Patrick B. wrote:
Let me get this straight, hopefully I am just imagining things....Is
there a"Lord Bullingdon" FAQ on some Kubrick related website? Now, I
remeber a loong time ago, LB came into the lives of regular amk
posters by sayingsomething about Kubrick, I forgot what the original
post was, but it had to do with some false rumor he was adamant was
true. Now, fast forward months,or has it been years later, and now he
is on some sort of FAQ???(At thispoint if there is no FAQ disregard
this entire nonsensical rambling). So, nowthere is some sort of
blacklist for "trolls" on the internet. This is the saddest thing I
have ever heard. And also, can we just retire the word "troll" from
newsgroup persons vocabulary. When you use this word,don't you feel
overwhelmingly like some internet junkie caricature.(See comic
bookstore owner from The Simpsons). Well, I'm not gonna say anymore, I
wouldn'twant to offend the people "in charge" of this newgroup in fear
that I toowill be blacklisted like some sort of Commie sympathizer
circa 1950. Let'sall just step back for a moment, and realize that amk
is just a messageboard, who's original purpose was to discuss Kubrick
and his films.All of a sudden it's become some sort of institution.
Come on people, it'sok, come on back, your tv is on, your kids are
running, reality is just aglance away from the radiation pit you are
staring at. Go.
--------------------------------------
From: ***@nostalghia.com (Jan Bielawski)
Newsgroups: alt.movies.kubrick
Personally I'm sick and tired of this "Lord Bullingdon FAQ". If L.B.
posts something that's wrong - correct it. But this following each and
every post of his by an obnoxious *anonymous* "FAQ" has to stop.
------------------------------------------
From: Chris Cathcart (***@liquidinformation.com)
Well, at least we know you're on a crusade against those mean, wicked
bad trolls that threaten the fabric of Usenet. Have you nothing
really better to do than research Google to find anything and
everything you can to fuel your crusade? You're fixated on BL and
everything having to do with him; pretty sad if you ask me....
------------------------------
From: ***@aol.com (Xfoliate )
(in reply to s_o_keefe's post)
at the group's expense? isn't that opinion? do you speak for the group
here?
Matt
-------------------------------
Regards,
sokeefeFAQ
s_o_keefe wrote:
bull