Art Haupt
2009-07-27 03:20:58 UTC
(Arthur C. Clarke, describing his early days working with Kubrick,
back in 1964:
"...[Stanley] had also acquired rights to a property with the
intriguing title 'Shadow on the Sun'; I remember nothing whatsoever
about it and have even forgotten the author's name, so presumably he
was not one of the s.f. regulars. Whoever he was, I hope he never
knows that I sabotaged his career, because Kubrick was promptly
informed that Clarke was *not* interested in developing other people's
ideas."
—from Clarke's 1991 intro
to a new edition of
his "2001" novel)
-----------
Geez. I wondered for years about what "Shadow on the Sun" really was.
(One possible suspect was "Shadows in the Sun," a 1954 novel by Chad
Oliver, who was an SF regular.)
Then, last week a simple 'Net search revealed all. The info is near
the bottom of the 2004 UK "Guardian" article about Kubrick's boxes,
which I'm sure many people have read before me. The link:
http://www.guardian.co.uk/film/2004/mar/27/features.weekend
In short: the "Shadow on the Sun" cited by Clarke wasn't a novel.
Rather, it was a BBC radio drama that Kubrick had followed in the
early '60s. The series' odd-sounding plot involved a meteor landing on
Earth.
Furthermore, the article, by Jon Ronson, says Kubrick didn't forget
"Shadow" after the '60s. In the early '90s K. played around with it
some more, getting hold of the BBC scripts. So "Shadow" is another
example of Kubrick holding on to a story idea for many years.
back in 1964:
"...[Stanley] had also acquired rights to a property with the
intriguing title 'Shadow on the Sun'; I remember nothing whatsoever
about it and have even forgotten the author's name, so presumably he
was not one of the s.f. regulars. Whoever he was, I hope he never
knows that I sabotaged his career, because Kubrick was promptly
informed that Clarke was *not* interested in developing other people's
ideas."
—from Clarke's 1991 intro
to a new edition of
his "2001" novel)
-----------
Geez. I wondered for years about what "Shadow on the Sun" really was.
(One possible suspect was "Shadows in the Sun," a 1954 novel by Chad
Oliver, who was an SF regular.)
Then, last week a simple 'Net search revealed all. The info is near
the bottom of the 2004 UK "Guardian" article about Kubrick's boxes,
which I'm sure many people have read before me. The link:
http://www.guardian.co.uk/film/2004/mar/27/features.weekend
In short: the "Shadow on the Sun" cited by Clarke wasn't a novel.
Rather, it was a BBC radio drama that Kubrick had followed in the
early '60s. The series' odd-sounding plot involved a meteor landing on
Earth.
Furthermore, the article, by Jon Ronson, says Kubrick didn't forget
"Shadow" after the '60s. In the early '90s K. played around with it
some more, getting hold of the BBC scripts. So "Shadow" is another
example of Kubrick holding on to a story idea for many years.